Showing posts with label trending topics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trending topics. Show all posts
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Trending Topics: Don't touch that!
Aside from the bunned, bespectacled librarian, the other stereotype most closely associated with libraries is probably the library creep and, those of us in business know, that sometimes these creeps...take matters into their own hands.
So although this isn't an uncommon occurrence, one of the top library stories this past week is the story of a man forbidden from "all libraries on the face of the Earth" after his activities at the Racine Public library. How is that even enforceable? An ankle monitor bracelet?
The story got some extra mileage by LJ's Annoyed Librarian entry yesterday dedicated to possible workarounds of the Earthly library ban for this man so that he can get his library fix and oddly likened public masturbation to sex in libraries (?). What I'm curious about is when will these stories stop being newsworthy -- or maybe a better question is who are these stories newsworthy to? As I mentioned before, library biz folk aren't really phased by these stories. This is not to say that it's acceptable or in any way "normal," (one never forgets their first interaction with a 'bater) but the majority of people who seem to get worked up about it are the general public. I suppose this is because they can't imagine coming into the office one day to find Jenkins openly shaking hands with the man downstairs. I envy them in that way.
| Image from tumblr, source unknown |
So although this isn't an uncommon occurrence, one of the top library stories this past week is the story of a man forbidden from "all libraries on the face of the Earth" after his activities at the Racine Public library. How is that even enforceable? An ankle monitor bracelet?
The story got some extra mileage by LJ's Annoyed Librarian entry yesterday dedicated to possible workarounds of the Earthly library ban for this man so that he can get his library fix and oddly likened public masturbation to sex in libraries (?). What I'm curious about is when will these stories stop being newsworthy -- or maybe a better question is who are these stories newsworthy to? As I mentioned before, library biz folk aren't really phased by these stories. This is not to say that it's acceptable or in any way "normal," (one never forgets their first interaction with a 'bater) but the majority of people who seem to get worked up about it are the general public. I suppose this is because they can't imagine coming into the office one day to find Jenkins openly shaking hands with the man downstairs. I envy them in that way.
Tuesday, March 12, 2013
Trending Topics: Job Security for realz, this one has Secret Service agents involved
Last year I posted a job announcement for a "wine librarian," today I post one for being the Commander in Chief's librarian. That's right, Obam-arian!
I'm trying to imagine myself saying, "Mr. President, I was able to locate that book with the blue cover you were searching for," or him swiveling around in his chair (yes, I know he's not a Bond character) and request that I brief him on how to download a book on his iPad -- oh, and fix the jam in the copier too...
I browsed the requirements and was like, "yes...yes...me also...me totally..." and then of course come the more important stuff like having specialized experience such as General Schedule grade equivalent salary, dealing with federal acquisitions and procuring government contracts. You know, the stuff that would be key factors to obtaining such a high profile job, not advising him on what to read next.
So while I'm one DC metro librarian who won't be applying for this cool gig, those who are interested will need to get their act together since the position closes today. Until Obama is interested in finding out what the book club selection will be this month, I'll just be over in the corner pretending that I scored that wine-o job and giving sassback to that copier.
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Trending Topics: Cover Redesigns for Classics -- Oh Anne Shirley!
Are you prepped to get your literary panties in
a twist? Last week one of my former
coworkers forwarded me a link to Jezebel’s story about the new cover redesign
for The Bell Jar. Because I was busy (explaining how to print out an email to a
patron for the hundredth time), I only had a few moments to glance over the
article but my reaction was expected: I grimaced, did a Liz Lemon worthy eye
roll, and chalked it up to corporate America’s idea to package and advertise a
book about depression into something possibly teen or chick lit friendly – with
pink and lipstick!
![]() |
| New and "Improved" vs Original |
Yesterday I was browsing some trending headlines and my
attention was drawn to a cover redesign for Anne of Green Gables and the fuss it has created. The traditional cover has transformed into one featuring a
sassy looking blonde who might suggest a story about a roll in the hay with the
farmer’s daughter rather than the tale of an unwanted freckled ginger. With some parents groups throwing a hissy
because they think that the redesign is "sexy" or "too adult" for a children’s
book, (I do have to admit that the new Anne Shirley would probably have no
problems getting that headstrong Gilbert Blythe to be at her beck and call) it
has some asking if the publishing industry has gone too far with covers.
Had I actually read the Jezebel article the first time, I
would’ve seen that they had already linked a picture of the new Anne of Green
Gables cover, but this made me curious about other classic titles
getting makeovers. Recently Wuthering Heights has
been renovated to appeal to the Twilight crowd with its new cover – one that
even boasts that it is Edward and Bella’s favorite book(!). And the latest Breakfast at Tiffany’s
edition is in Tiffany & Co.’s trademark blue and brings to mind something
classier than a free spirited teenage call girl. Wtf is going on and can we expect this trend to continue?
The publishing industry doesn't seem to care what message the new jacket sends. Do these revamped and “updated” covers insult
teens or other audiences as indicated (or even the long dead authors)? Do they trivialize the subject matter? Are
these any better than books that have the movie tie-in covers promoting “now a
major motion picture”? Does the end
(baiting someone to read) justify the means? Obvi, I don’t have any concrete
answers to these questions, but I do believe it lends to an interesting topic
for discussion among librarians, teachers, readers, book industry employees,
graphic designers, etc.
This is a rare instance where I have actually
read all of the books featured and I can honestly say that none of the “modern”
alterations accurately represent any of the titles in my opinion, but some have posed that maybe the same could be
said of previous covers. Except the old Anne of Green Gables says awkward redhead. Oh, and previous The Bell Jar looks like a stone cold bummer. Annnnd now that I'm thinking of it, the boring landscape of Wuthering Heights makes me yawn like I'm back in 11th grad lit. Of course they don't have the same agenda either. Looking up old covers, I find that the 1959 paperback edition of
Breakfast appears to be fairly honest about its contents (I recall receiving the middle version as a gift and wondering if it contained the story of a pasty, little man). In my searching, I also came across several
Bell Jar parodies that this makeover s-storm has inspired.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



